The Blood-Red Hands of Ho Chi Minh

The Blood-Red Hands of
Ho Chi Minh

Readers Digest,

November 1968
John G.Hubbell

The village chief and his wife were distraught. One of their children, a
seven-year-old boy, had been missing for four days. They were
terrified, they explained to Marine Lt. Gen. Lewis W. Walt, because they
believed he had been captured by the Vietcong.

Suddenly, the boy came out of the jungle and ran across the rice paddies
toward the village. He was crying. His mother ran to him and swept him
up in her arms. Both of his hands had been cut off, and there was a sign
around his neck, a message to his father: if he or any one else in the
village dared go to the polls during the upcoming elections, something
worse would happen to the rest of his children.

The VC delivered a similar warning to the residents of a hamlet not far
from Danang. All were herded before the home of their chief. While they
and the chief’s pregnant wife and four children were forced to look on,
the chief’s tongue was cut out. Then his genital organs were sliced off
and sewn inside his bloody mouth. As he died, the VC went to work on his
wife, slashing open her womb. Then, the nine-year-old son: a bamboo
lance was rammed through one ear and out the other. Two more of the
chief’s children were murdered the same way. The VC did not harm the
five-year-old daughter — not physically: they simply left her crying,
holding her dead mother’s hand.

General Walt tells of his arrival at a district headquarters the day
after it had been overrun by VC and North Vietnamese army troops. Those
South Vietnamese soldiers not killed in the battle had been tied up and
shot through their mouths or the backs of their heads. Then their wives
and children, including a number of two- and three-year-olds, had been
brought into the street, disrobed, tortured and finally executed: their
throats were cut; they were shot, beheaded, disemboweled. The mutilated
bodies were draped on fences and hung with signs telling the rest of the
community that if they continued to support the Saigon government and
allied forces, they could look forward to the same fate.

These atrocities are not isolated cases; they are typical. For this is
the enemy’s way of warfare, clearly expressed in his combat policy in
Vietnam. While the naive and anti-American throughout the world, cued by
communist propaganda; have trumpeted against American “immorality” in
the Vietnam war — aerial bombing, the use of napalm, casualties caused
by American combat action — daily and nightly for years, the communists
have systematically authored history’s grisliest catalogue of barbarism.
By the end of 1967, they had committed at least 100,000 acts of terror
against the South Vietnamese people. The record is an endless litany of
tortures, mutilations and murders that would have been instructive even
to such as Adolf Hitler.

Perhaps because until recently the terrorism has been waged mainly in
remote places, this aspect of the war has received scant attention from
the press. Hence the enemy has largely succeeded in casting himself in
the role of noble revolutionary. It is long past time for Americans, who
are sick and tired of being vilified for trying to help South Vietnam
stay free, to take a hard look at the nature of this enemy.

Bloodbath Discipline.

The terror had its real beginning when Red dictator Ho Chi Minh
consolidated his power in the North. More than a year before his 1954
victory over the French, he launched a savage campaign against his own
people. In virtually every North Vietnamese village, strong-arm squads
assembled the populace to witness the “confessions” of landowners. As
time went on, businessmen, intellectuals, school teachers, civic leaders
— all who represented a potential source of future opposition — were
also rounded up and forced to “confess” to “errors of thought.” There
followed public “trials,” conviction and, in many cases, execution.
People were shot, beheaded, beaten to death; some were tied up, thrown
into open graves and covered with stones until they were crushed to
death, Ho has renewed his terror in North Vietnam periodically. Between
50,000 and 100,000 are believed to have died in these blood-baths — in a
coldly calculated effort to discipline the party and the masses. To be
sure, few who escape Ho’s terror now seem likely to tempt his wrath.
During the 1950s, however, he had to quell some sizeable uprisings in
North Vietnam — most notably one that occurred in early November 1956,
in the An province, which included Ho’s birthplace village of Nam Dan.
So heavily had he taxed the region that the inhabitants finally banded
together and refused to meet his price. Ho sent troops to collect, and
then sent in an army division, shooting. About 6,000 unarmed villagers
were killed. The survivors scattered, some escaping to the South. The
slaughter went largely unnoticed by a world then preoccupied with the
Soviet Union’s rape of Hungary.

With North Vietnam tightly in hand, the central committee of the North
Vietnamese communist party met in Hanoi on March 13, 1959, and decided
it was time to move against South Vietnam. Soon, large numbers of Ho’s
guerrillas were infiltrating to join cadres that had remained there
after the French defeat in 1954. Their mission: to eliminate South
Vietnam’s leadership, including elected officials, “natural” leaders,
anyone and everyone to whom people might turn for advice. Also to be
liquidated were any South Vietnamese who had relatives in their
country’s armed forces, civil, services or police; any who failed to pay
communist taxes promptly; any with five or more years of education.

A captured VC guerrilla explained how his eight-man team moved against a
particular target village: “The first time we entered the village, we
arrested and executed on the spot four men who had been pointed out to
us by the party’s district headquarters as our most dangerous opponents.
One, who had fought in the war against the French was now a known
supporter of the South Vietnamese government. Another had been seen
fraternizing with government troops. These two were shot. The others,
the village’s principal landowners, were beheaded.”

General Walt tells of the “revolutionary purity” of Vietcong who came
home to two other villages. In one case, a 15-year-old girl who had
given Walt’s Marines information on VC activities was taken into the
jungle and tortured for hours, then beheaded. As a warning to other
villagers, her head was placed on a pole in front of her home. Her
murderers were her brother and two of his VC comrades. In the other
case, when a VC learned that his wife and two young children had
cooperated with Marines who had befriended them, he himself cut out
their tongues.

Genocide.

In such fashion did the storm of terror break over South Vietnam. In
1960, some 1,500 South Vietnamese civilians were killed and 700
abducted. By early 1965, the communists’ Radio Hanoi and Radio
Liberation were able to boast that the VC had destroyed 7,559 South
Vietnamese hamlets. By the end of last year, 15,138 South Vietnamese
civilians had been killed, 45,929 kidnaped. Few of the kidnaped are ever
seen again.

Ho’s assault on South Vietnam’s leadership class has, in fact, been a
form of genocide — and all too efficient. Thus, if South Vietnam
survives in freedom, it will take the country a generation to fully
replace this vital element of its society. But the grand design of
terror involves other objectives, too. It hopes to force the attacked
government into excessively repressive anti-terrorist actions, which
tend to earn the government the contempt and hatred of the people. It
also seeks valuable propaganda in the form of well-publicized
counter-atrocities certain to occur at the individual level — for South
Vietnamese soldiers whose families have suffered at communists’ hands
are not likely to deal gently with captured VC and North Vietnamese
troops.

Dr. A. W. Wylie, an Australian physician serving in a Mekong Delta
hospital, points out that a hamlet or village need not cooperate with
the Saigon government or allied forces to mark itself for butchery; it
need only be neutral, a political condition not acceptable to the
communists. After a place has been worked over, its people of
responsibility are always identifiable by the particularly hideous
nature of their wounds. He cites some cases he has seen:

— When the VC finished with one pregnant woman, both of her legs were
dangling by ribbons of flesh and had to be amputated. Her husband, a
hamlet chief, had just been strangled before her eyes, and she also had
seen her three-year-old child machine-gunned to death. Four hours after
her legs were amputated, she aborted the child she was carrying. But
perhaps the worst thing that happened to her that day was that she
survived.

— A village policeman was held in place while a VC gunman shot off his
nose and fired bullets through his cheekbones so close to his eyes that
they were reduced to bloody shreds. He later died from uncontrollable
hemorrhages.

— A 20-year-old schoolteacher had knelt in a corner trying to protect
herself with her arms while a VC flailed at her with a machete. She had
been unsuccessful; the back of her head was cut so deeply that the brain
was exposed. She died from brain damage and loss of blood.

Flamethrowers at Work.

Last December 5, communists perpetrated
what must rank among history’s most monstrous blasphemies at Dak Son, a
central highlands village of some 2,000. Montagnards — a tribe of gentle
but fiercely independent mountain people. They had moved away from
their old village in VC-controlled territory, ignored several VC orders
to return and refused to furnish male recruits to the VC.

Two VC battalions struck in the earliest hours, when the village was
asleep. Quickly killing the sentries, the communists swarmed among the
rows of tidy, thatch-roofed homes, putting the torch to them. The first
knowledge that many of the villagers had of the attack was when VC
troops turned flamethrowers on them in their beds. Some families awoke
in time to escape into nearby jungle. Some men stood and fought, giving
their wives and children time to crawl into trenches dug beneath their
homes as protection against mortar and rifle fire. But when every
building was ablaze, the communists took their flamethrowers to the
mouth of each trench and poured in a long, searing hell of fire — and,
for good measure, tossed grenades into many. Methodical and thorough,
they stayed at it until daybreak, then left in the direction of the
Cambodian border.

Morning revealed a scene of unbelievable horror. The village now was
only a smoldering, corpse-littered patch on the lush green countryside.
The bodies of 252 people, mostly mothers and children, lay blistered,
charred, burned to the bone. Survivors, many of them horribly burned,
wandered aimlessly about or stayed close to the incinerated bodies of
loved ones, crying. Some 500 were missing; scores were later found in
the jungle, dead of burns and other wounds; many have not been found.

The massacre at Dak Son was a warning to other Montagnard Settlements to
cooperate. But many of the tribesmen now fight with the allies.

If the communists’ “persuasion” techniques spawn deep and enduring
hatred, Ho could not care less; the first necessity is the utter,
subjugation, of the people. Ho was disturbed by the rapid expansion of
South Vietnam’s educational system: between 1954 and 1959, the number of
schools had tripled and the number of students had quadrupled. An
educated populace, especially one educated to democratic ideals, does
not fit into the communist scheme. Hence, the country’s school system
was one of Ho’s first targets. So efficiently did he move against it
that the World Confederation of Organizations of the Teaching Profession
soon sent a commission, chaired by India’s Shri S. Natarajan, to
investigate.

Typical of the commission’s findings is what happened in the jungle
province of An Xuyen. During the 1954-55 academic year, 3,096 children
attended 32 schools in the province; by the end of the 1960-61 school
year, 27,953 were attending 189 schools. Then the communists moved in.
Parents were advised not to send their children to school.

Teachers were warned to stop providing civic education, and to stop
teaching children to honor their country, flag and president. Teachers
who failed to comply were shot or beheaded or had their throats cut, and
the reasons for the executions were pinned or nailed to their bodies.

The Natarajan commission reported how the VC stopped one school bus and
told the children not to attend school anymore. When the children
continued for another week, the communists stopped the bus again,
selected a six-year-old passenger and cut off her fingers. The other
children were told, “This is what will happen to you if you continue to
go to that school.” The school closed.

In one year, in An Xuyen province alone, Ho’s agents closed 150 schools,
killed or kidnapped more than five dozen teachers, and cut school
enrollment by nearly 20,000. By the end of the 1961-62 school year, 636
South Vietnamese schools were closed, and enrollment had decreased by
nearly 80,000.

But, in the face of this attack, South Vietnam’s education system has
staged a strong comeback. Schools destroyed by the communists have been
rebuilt, destroyed, and rebuilt again. Many teachers have given up their
own homes and move each night into a different student’s home so the
communists can’t find them, or commute from nearby cities, where they
leave their families.

Against such determination, the size of Ho’s failure can be measured: in
1954, there were approximately 400,000 pupils in school in North and
South Vietnam together; today South Vietnam alone has some two million
in school. About 35,000 — four times as many as in 1962 — now attend
five South Vietnamese universities, while 42,000 more attend night
college.

A South Vietnamese government official explains: “A war shatters many
traditional values. But the idea of education has an absolute hold on
our people’s imagination.”

Bar of Justice.

The pitch of communist terrorism keeps rising. After the Tet carnage at
Hue early this year, 19 mass graves yielded more than 1,000 bodies,
mostly civilians — old men and women, young girls, schoolboys, priests,
nuns, doctors (including three Germans who had been medical-school
faculty members at Hue University). About half had been buried alive,
and many were found bound together with barbed wire, with dirt or cloth
stuffed into their mouths and throats, and their eyes wide open. The
communists came to Hue with a long list of names for liquidation —
people who worked for the South Vietnamese or for the US government, or
who had relatives who did. But as their military situation grew
increasingly desperate, they began grabbing people at random, out of
their homes and off the streets, condemned them at drumhead courts as
“reactionaries” or for “opposing the revolution” and killed them.

“The Tet offensive represented a drastic change in tactics,” says
General Walt. “This is a war to take over the South Vietnamese people.
Ho launched the Tet offensive because he knew he was losing the people.
But his troops didn’t know it; they were told that they didn’t need any
withdrawal plans because the people would rise and fight with them to
drive out the Americans. What happened was just the opposite. Many
fought against them like tigers.” Some of the Tet offensive’s explosion
of atrocities probably can be attributed to sheer vengeful frustration
on the part of Ho’s terror squads — which Ho may well have foreseen, and
counted on.

The full record of communist barbarism in Vietnam would fill volumes. If
South Vietnam falls to the communists, millions more are certain to
die, large numbers of them at the hands of Ho’s imaginative tortures.
That is a primary reason why, at election times, more than 80 percent of
eligible South Vietnamese defy every communist threat and go to the
polls, and why, after mortar attacks, voting lines always form anew. It
is why the South Vietnamese pray that their allies will stick the fight
through with them. It is why the vast majority of American troops in
Vietnam are convinced that the war is worth fighting. It is why those
who prance about even in our own country — waving Vietcong flags and
decrying our “unjust” and “immoral” war should be paid the contempt they
deserve.

Finally, it is why the communists should be driven once and for all from
South Vietnam — and why, if possible, the monsters who presently rule
North Vietnam should be brought before the bar of justice.

This entry was posted in Tài liệu. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s